Both photos are set up by the photographer taking the photo but in different ways because with a fashion photo they are trying not to show off the person wearing the clothes.
Nearly all fashion photos are manipulated in some way to make what they are wearing more presentable, all the models will have lots of make-up put on and in some bill boards they will be air-brushed. I think there could be a moral image here because young people will think they have to be excactly like the person is to be presentable and i dont think the model would want that.
I think when a image is edited that permission is needed from the model to have all this editing done to there face and/or body and i also think they should tone it down a bit so that the average person feels like they are presentable in this world and nothing is wrong with them, the model should have control of what is done to her because then you are more likely to get an image of a normal person presenting the clothes this will make people believe that they are able to wear the clothes which would help the fashion industry
Is there a clash between the creative and commercial side of fashion photography??
There tends to be alot more effort that goes into a fashion photo compared to a potrait photo because you see in magazines that there are sceneries around the people wearing the clothes to try and emphasise what time of year the clothes are for. I think they do this to try and make more money because they feel it could appeal to more of an audience if there is something that drags them in.
Fashion is very creative as you see because there is many different styles of clothes that are made for each different season but i do feel there is a clash between the creative and commercial side of the fashion photography because they seem to try so hard to increase the size of money they get each year by using different kinds of advertising and how they have the set to show off the clothes.